DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Kia Optima vs 2015 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeJeep
OptimaModelCompass
2014Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,60 s
202 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
165 HPPower156 HP
196 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption10,20 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,10 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption7,60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/55 R17Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4448 mm
1830 mmWidth1812 mm
1455 mmHeight1718 mm
1500 KgWeight1499 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Kia Optima and 2015 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…