DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Toyota RAV4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeToyota
OptimaModelRAV4
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
202 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1987 cc
165 HPPower151 HP
196 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4570 mm
1830 mmWidth1845 mm
1455 mmHeight1660 mm
1500 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…