2013 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Mazda CX-5 vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 CVVT 16V EcoDynamics (165 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationKia Optima
MazdaMakeKia
CX-5ModelOptima
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationKia Optima
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
197 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
160 HPPower165 HP
208 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationKia Optima
4555 mmLength4845 mm
1840 mmWidth1830 mm
1710 mmHeight1455 mm
1488 KgWeight1500 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2795 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda CX-5 and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52013 and 2013 model yearsVSImage unavailableKia Optima vs Mazda CX-52013 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Legacy vs Mazda CX-52013 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 3 vs Mazda CX-52013 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Forester vs Mazda CX-52013 and 2013 model yearsComments are loading…