2011 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 CVVT 16V (165 Hp) 2011Overall Score65.5/100
2011 Kia Optima vs 2011 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • BMW
3 Serisi
BMW 3 Serisi 2011Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
KiaMakeBMW
OptimaModel3 Serisi
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
165 HPPower143 HP
198 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
4845 mmLength4612 mm
1830 mmWidth1782 mm
1455 mmHeight1384 mm
1404 KgWeight1595 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Kia Optima and 2011 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…