DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 BMW 3 Serisi vs 2011 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeKia
3 SerisiModelOptima
2011Model year2011
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower165 HP
190 NmTorque198 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16 HTyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4612 mmLength4845 mm
1782 mmWidth1830 mm
1384 mmHeight1455 mm
1595 KgWeight1404 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 BMW 3 Serisi and 2011 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…