2011 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 CVVT 16V (165 Hp) 2011Overall Score65.5/100
2011 Kia Optima vs 2011 Great Wall Cowry Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Great Wall
Cowry
Great Wall Cowry 2.0 (143 Hp) 2011Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Great Wall Cowry
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
KiaMakeGreat Wall
OptimaModelCowry
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
165 HPPower143 HP
198 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
4845 mmLength4574 mm
1830 mmWidth1704 mm
1455 mmHeight1845 mm
1404 KgWeight1510 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Kia Optima and 2011 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…