DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Optima vs 2006 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeHonda
OptimaModelCR-V
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
208 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
144 HPPower150 HP
188 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4555 mm
1805 mmWidth1780 mm
1480 mmHeight1710 mm
1408 KgWeight1485 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Optima and 2006 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…