DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Honda CR-V vs 2006 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeKia
CR-VModelOptima
2006Model year2006
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
177 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower144 HP
192 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4735 mm
1780 mmWidth1805 mm
1710 mmHeight1480 mm
1485 KgWeight1408 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Honda CR-V and 2006 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…