DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Optima vs 2006 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelGalaxy
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
208 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
144 HPPower145 HP
188 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4641 mm
1805 mmWidth1810 mm
1480 mmHeight1732 mm
1408 KgWeight1610 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Optima and 2006 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…