DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Focus vs 2005 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeKia
FocusModelOptima
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
193 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower144 HP
185 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4342 mmLength4735 mm
1840 mmWidth1805 mm
1497 mmHeight1480 mm
1326 KgWeight1408 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Focus and 2005 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…