DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Kia Optima vs 2005 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelFocus
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
208 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
144 HPPower145 HP
188 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4342 mm
1805 mmWidth1840 mm
1480 mmHeight1497 mm
1408 KgWeight1326 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Kia Optima and 2005 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…