DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Kia Optima vs 2008 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

67.75–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
KiaMakeBMW
OptimaModelX3
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
10,3 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
201 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW X3
4800 mmLength4569 mm
1805 mmWidth1853 mm
1480 mmHeight1674 mm
1528 KgWeight1655 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Kia Optima and 2008 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…