2008 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2008Overall Score68.25/100
2008 BMW X3 vs 2008 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 CRDi (150 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
BMW X3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
68.25–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
BMWMakeKia
X3ModelOptima
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
198 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
200 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationKia Optima
4569 mmLength4800 mm
1853 mmWidth1805 mm
1674 mmHeight1480 mm
1655 KgWeight1528 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 BMW X3 and 2008 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW X3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…