E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Kia Optima vs 2005 Acura CSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
KiaMakeAcura
OptimaModelCSX
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
149 HPPower157 HP
193 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/55R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
4745 mmLength4544 mm
1815 mmWidth1752 mm
1420 mmHeight1435 mm
1405 KgWeight1290 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Kia Optima and 2005 Acura CSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2005 Rover 45VS2005 Kia OptimaRover 45 vs Kia Optima2005 and 2005 model years2005 Rover 75VS2005 Kia OptimaRover 75 vs Kia Optima2005 and 2005 model years2005 Saab 9-3VS2005 Kia OptimaSaab 9-3 vs Kia Optima2005 and 2005 model years2005 Ford FiestaVS2005 Kia OptimaFord Fiesta vs Kia Optima2005 and 2005 model years2005 Mazda 3VS2005 Kia OptimaMazda 3 vs Kia Optima2005 and 2005 model years

Comments are loading…