2005 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.0 V6 (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score65.5/100
2005 Rover 75 vs 2005 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2005Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationKia Optima
RoverMakeKia
75ModelOptima
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationKia Optima
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower149 HP
185 NmTorque193 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationKia Optima
4747 mmLength4745 mm
1778 mmWidth1815 mm
1424 mmHeight1420 mm
1445 KgWeight1405 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Rover 75 and 2005 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…