2005 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2005Overall Score66.25/100
2005 Kia Optima vs 2005 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 t (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
KiaMakeSaab
OptimaModel9-3
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
149 HPPower150 HP
193 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
4745 mmLength4635 mm
1815 mmWidth1762 mm
1420 mmHeight1434 mm
1405 KgWeight1585 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Kia Optima and 2005 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…