2005 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2005Overall Score66.25/100
2005 Kia Optima vs 2005 Mazda MX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Mazda
MX-5
Mazda MX-5 2.0 i 16V (160) 2005Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda MX-5
KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModelMX-5
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda MX-5
—0–100 km/h8,3 s
195 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
149 HPPower160 HP
193 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda MX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda MX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda MX-5
4745 mmLength3995 mm
1815 mmWidth1720 mm
1420 mmHeight1245 mm
1405 KgWeight1055 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Kia Optima and 2005 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…