DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Optima vs 2004 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeHonda
OptimaModelAccord
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
195 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
149 HPPower155 HP
193 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4665 mm
1815 mmWidth1760 mm
1420 mmHeight1445 mm
1405 KgWeight1320 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Optima and 2004 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…