DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Rover 45 vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 45SpecificationKia Optima
RoverMakeKia
45ModelOptima
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 45SpecificationKia Optima
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower149 HP
185 NmTorque193 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 45SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 45SpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R16 VTyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 45SpecificationKia Optima
4517 mmLength4745 mm
1696 mmWidth1815 mm
1394 mmHeight1420 mm
1340 KgWeight1405 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Rover 45 and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…