2004 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2004Overall Score63.25/100
2004 Kia Optima vs 2004 Chevrolet Cobalt Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Cobalt
Chevrolet Cobalt 2.2 i 16V SS (147) 2004Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Cobalt
KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelCobalt
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Cobalt
—0–100 km/h6,2 s
195 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
149 HPPower147 HP
193 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Cobalt
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank49 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Cobalt
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size215/45 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Cobalt
4745 mmLength4580 mm
1815 mmWidth1725 mm
1420 mmHeight1415 mm
1405 KgWeight1350 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2624 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Kia Optima and 2004 Chevrolet Cobalt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…