2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.0 V6 (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 75
KiaMakeRover
OptimaModel75
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 75
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
149 HPPower150 HP
193 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 75
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 75
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/65R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 75
4745 mmLength4747 mm
1815 mmWidth1778 mm
1420 mmHeight1424 mm
1405 KgWeight1445 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2746 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…