2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 16V ST170 (172 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelFocus
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
195 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
149 HPPower172 HP
193 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/70 R14Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
4745 mmLength4178 mm
1815 mmWidth1702 mm
1420 mmHeight1481 mm
1405 KgWeight1245 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…