DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMercedes-Benz
OptimaModelE Serisi
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
149 HPPower136 HP
193 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4816 mm
1815 mmWidth1799 mm
1420 mmHeight1438 mm
1335 KgWeight1540 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2833 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…