2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.8 (134 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 1.8 i 16V (160 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZR
KiaMakeMG
OptimaModelZR
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h7,8 s
199 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1836 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
134 HPPower160 HP
169 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZR
4745 mmLength4011 mm
1815 mmWidth1690 mm
1420 mmHeight1400 mm
1390 KgWeight1090 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…