DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 FAW Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationFAW Bora
KiaMakeFAW
OptimaModelBora
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationFAW Bora
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
199 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1836 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
134 HPPower150 HP
169 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationFAW Bora
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationFAW Bora
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationFAW Bora
4745 mmLength4376 mm
1815 mmWidth1735 mm
1420 mmHeight1446 mm
1390 KgWeight1380 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 FAW Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…