DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia Niro vs 2016 Suzuki Swift Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Swift

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSuzuki
NiroModelSwift
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1591 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
105 HPPower136 HP
147 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
3,9 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size195/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength3890 mm
1800 mmWidth1695 mm
1535 mmHeight1510 mm
—Weight1115 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia Niro and 2016 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Swift leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…