DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Kia KX3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia KX3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationKia KX3
MazdaMakeKia
3ModelKX3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationKia KX3
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
165 HPPower160 HP
210 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationKia KX3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationKia KX3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/45 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationKia KX3
4460 mmLength4270 mm
1795 mmWidth1780 mm
1450 mmHeight1645 mm
1220 KgWeight1510 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2590 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Kia KX3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia KX3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…