DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia KX3 vs 2016 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia KX3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia KX3SpecificationMazda CX-3
KiaMakeMazda
KX3ModelCX-3
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Kia KX3SpecificationMazda CX-3
—0–100 km/h8,7 s
183 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
192 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia KX3SpecificationMazda CX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank44 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia KX3SpecificationMazda CX-3
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia KX3SpecificationMazda CX-3
4270 mmLength4275 mm
1780 mmWidth1765 mm
1645 mmHeight1535 mm
1510 KgWeight1235 Kg
2590 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia KX3 and 2016 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia KX3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…