DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) vs 2004 Chevrolet Classic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Classic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChevrolet
Cerato (Forte)ModelClassic
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
208 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1975 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
143 HPPower141 HP
186 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/50 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4340 mmLength4835 mm
1735 mmWidth1760 mm
1470 mmHeight1425 mm
1250 KgWeight1375 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) and 2004 Chevrolet Classic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…