DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZR vs 2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeKia
ZRModelCerato (Forte)
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
185 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1975 cc
113 HPPower143 HP
260 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4011 mmLength4340 mm
1690 mmWidth1735 mm
1400 mmHeight1470 mm
1155 KgWeight1250 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZR and 2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…