DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Kia Carnival vs 2010 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
CarnivalModelBT-50
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
197 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2656 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
189 HPPower143 HP
249 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/70 R16; 235/60 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4810 mmLength5075 mm
1985 mmWidth1805 mm
1760 mmHeight1750 mm
2040 KgWeight1940 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Kia Carnival and 2010 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…