DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Kia Cadenza vs 2015 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeJeep
CadenzaModelWrangler
2013Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
230 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3470 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
290 HPPower280 HP
338 NmTorque342 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,8 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size245/75 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4223 mm
1850 mmWidth1873 mm
1475 mmHeight1840 mm
1575 KgWeight1753 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2424 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Kia Cadenza and 2015 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…