DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Jeep Wrangler vs 2013 Kia Cadenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeKia
WranglerModelCadenza
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
180 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3470 cc
280 HPPower290 HP
342 NmTorque338 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,3 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/75 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4223 mmLength4965 mm
1873 mmWidth1850 mm
1840 mmHeight1475 mm
1753 KgWeight1575 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Jeep Wrangler and 2013 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…