DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Kia Cadenza vs 2015 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
CadenzaModelV60
2014Model year2015
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,0 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3342 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
297 HPPower304 HP
346 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption14,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/40 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4635 mm
1850 mmWidth1825 mm
1475 mmHeight1484 mm
1717 KgWeight1822 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Kia Cadenza and 2015 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…