DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volvo V60 vs 2014 Kia Cadenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeKia
V60ModelCadenza
2015Model year2014
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement3342 cc
304 HPPower297 HP
440 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size245/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4965 mm
1825 mmWidth1850 mm
1484 mmHeight1475 mm
1822 KgWeight1717 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volvo V60 and 2014 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…