2013 • Kia
Cadenza
Kia Cadenza 2.7 V6 (166 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
2013 Kia Cadenza vs 2015 Subaru Forester Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.5 (175 Hp) 2015Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Kia Cadenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia CadenzaSpecificationSubaru Forester
KiaMakeSubaru
CadenzaModelForester
2013Model year2015
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia CadenzaSpecificationSubaru Forester
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2657 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
166 HPPower175 HP
246 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia CadenzaSpecificationSubaru Forester
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia CadenzaSpecificationSubaru Forester
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears—
215/65 R16Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia CadenzaSpecificationSubaru Forester
4965 mmLength4595 mm
1850 mmWidth1795 mm
1475 mmHeight1735 mm
1574 KgWeight1513 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Cadenza and 2015 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…