DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Subaru Forester vs 2013 Kia Cadenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeKia
ForesterModelCadenza
2015Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2657 cc
175 HPPower166 HP
235 NmTorque246 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank85 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
225/60 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4595 mmLength4965 mm
1795 mmWidth1850 mm
1735 mmHeight1475 mm
1513 KgWeight1574 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Subaru Forester and 2013 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…