2012 • Kia
Cadenza
Kia Cadenza 2.4 (181 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Kia Cadenza vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D4 (177 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Kia Cadenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo C30
KiaMakeVolvo
CadenzaModelC30
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo C30
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
181 HPPower177 HP
231 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo C30
4965 mmLength4266 mm
1850 mmWidth1782 mm
1475 mmHeight1447 mm
1506 KgWeight1451 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Kia Cadenza and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…