2011 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 D (175 Hp) 2011Overall Score67.75/100
2011 Volvo S80 vs 2012 Kia Cadenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Kia
Cadenza
Kia Cadenza 2.4 (181 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Kia Cadenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationKia Cadenza
VolvoMakeKia
S80ModelCadenza
2011Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationKia Cadenza
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
175 HPPower181 HP
420 NmTorque231 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationKia Cadenza
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationKia Cadenza
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationKia Cadenza
4851 mmLength4965 mm
1861 mmWidth1850 mm
1493 mmHeight1475 mm
1647 KgWeight1506 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2845 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Volvo S80 and 2012 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…