DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Kia Cadenza vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeJeep
CadenzaModelCompass
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,90 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
181 HPPower163 HP
231 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4448 mm
1850 mmWidth1812 mm
1475 mmHeight1718 mm
1506 KgWeight1680 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Kia Cadenza and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…