2009 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.8 CRDi (174 Hp) 2009Overall Score77.5/100
2009 Jeep Wrangler vs 2009 Cadillac CTS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 2.8L V6 SFI (211 Hp) 2009Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationCadillac CTS
JeepMakeCadillac
WranglerModelCTS
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationCadillac CTS
—0–100 km/h8,3 s
180 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2778 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
174 HPPower211 HP
410 NmTorque246 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationCadillac CTS
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep WranglerSpecificationCadillac CTS
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/75 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationCadillac CTS
4751 mmLength4829 mm
1877 mmWidth1793 mm
1834 mmHeight1440 mm
1980 KgWeight1765 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Jeep Wrangler and 2009 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…