DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Cadillac CTS vs 2009 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeJeep
CTSModelWrangler
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2778 cc
211 HPPower174 HP
246 NmTorque410 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size255/75 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4829 mmLength4751 mm
1793 mmWidth1877 mm
1440 mmHeight1834 mm
1765 KgWeight1980 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Cadillac CTS and 2009 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…