2004 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.4 i 16V (147 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Jeep Wrangler vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.4 (140 Hp) 2005Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo V50
JeepMakeVolvo
WranglerModelV50
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo V50
13,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
155 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
147 HPPower140 HP
224 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank62 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo V50
3883 mmLength4522 mm
1694 mmWidth1845 mm
1750 mmHeight1457 mm
1605 KgWeight1335 Kg
2373 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Jeep Wrangler and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…