2005 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.4 (140 Hp) 2005Overall Score56.5/100
2005 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Jeep Wrangler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.4 i 16V (147 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationJeep Wrangler
VolvoMakeJeep
V50ModelWrangler
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors2
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationJeep Wrangler
10,7 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
140 HPPower147 HP
220 NmTorque224 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationJeep Wrangler
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank57 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationJeep Wrangler
4522 mmLength3883 mm
1845 mmWidth1694 mm
1457 mmHeight1750 mm
1335 KgWeight1605 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2373 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Volvo V50 and 2004 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…