DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi 90 vs 1989 Toyota MR 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota MR 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationToyota MR 2
AudiMakeToyota
90ModelMR 2
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationToyota MR 2
12,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
191 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2164 cc
133 HPPower132 HP
190 NmTorque190 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationToyota MR 2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationToyota MR 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
3Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationToyota MR 2
4478 mmLength4140 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1240 mm
1365 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi 90 and 1989 Toyota MR 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota MR 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…