DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi 90 vs 1989 Toyota Chaser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Chaser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
90ModelChaser
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
133 HPPower135 HP
190 NmTorque181 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
3Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4478 mmLength4690 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1375 mm
1365 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi 90 and 1989 Toyota Chaser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Chaser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…