DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2003 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeGMC
Grand CherokeeModelYukon
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats9
5Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed156 km/h
5654 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
326 HPPower324 HP
500 NmTorque502 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank146 lt
21,3 ltUrban consumption—
12,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/65 R17Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength5570 mm
1870 mmWidth2002 mm
1770 mmHeight1923 mm
2175 KgWeight2310 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase3302 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2003 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…