DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GMC Yukon vs 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeJeep
YukonModelGrand Cherokee
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
9Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,4 s
156 km/hTop speed208 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5654 cc
324 HPPower326 HP
502 NmTorque500 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
146 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption21,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,0 lt
—Average consumption15,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength4750 mm
2002 mmWidth1870 mm
1923 mmHeight1770 mm
2310 KgWeight2175 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GMC Yukon and 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…