DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2003 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeOpel
Grand CherokeeModelOmega
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
190 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2685 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
400 NmTorque300 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
78 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4611 mmLength4898 mm
1858 mmWidth1775 mm
1805 mmHeight1450 mm
1980 KgWeight1610 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2003 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…