2003 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
2003 Opel Omega vs 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Jeep
Grand Cherokee
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2.7 CDR (163 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
OpelMakeJeep
OmegaModelGrand Cherokee
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
11,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
206 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2685 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
300 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank78 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
4898 mmLength4611 mm
1775 mmWidth1858 mm
1450 mmHeight1805 mm
1610 KgWeight1980 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Opel Omega and 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…